It was easily the most stable piece of hardware + OS that I have ever used.
![apple macos server apple macos server](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/software/detail-page/B000BX7JLE-6.png)
My small music related business used to run a Mac Pro 1,1 on Snow Leopard Server as the major file server.
Apple macos server how to#
You don't need Apple to sell you a server OS or hardware, you just need a very small amount of competence and maybe a Google search to tell you how to do anything from file sharing to running a mail server or Open Directory.
Apple macos server install#
It can do anything else with a few clicks or an install from Homebrew. Apple uses the Common Unix Printing System for that. Many important tasks are already using a client-server model internally. A desktop OS is a server OS if you configure it to be one. Apple used to do it, probably because the paid software community expected it because of Microsoft, but it has never made sense. Why is this a big deal? If the server software is built in now, where's the problem? Thinking of a server as something separate from a desktop OS is a Microsoft thing. (Microsoft did some of that but it doesn't make it a good idea.) With a whole server OS, you can ensure the default offerings are all server and system related tools. IMO, you really don't want a dedicated server to have a menu full of icons to launch desktop games and utilities anyway. It's just a more robust file system when you need to reliably store large amounts of data for quick access.) (BSD Unix implements OpenZFS filesystem for things like TrueNAS/FreeNAS, for example. They may even use a different filesystem for a server OS. Server OS's often reserve far more memory for record locks and disk caching to handle this, and they may prioritize the background processes running over having a "snappy" desktop user interface for whoever is managing the system. A desktop OS only has to deal with the user in front of the screen launching apps and editing files not juggling a whole office full of people doing it. For example? A server is often hit with many dozens of requests at one time to open or write various files. It has more to do with the assurance that the entire thing is configured, right from the initial installation, to be optimized for that use-case. It's not that it's impossible to take a desktop OS and configure it to work as a server. This has almost always been the case with Linux distributions too.
![apple macos server apple macos server](https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-a1x7hg2jgk/images/stencil/960w/products/13723/79261/apple-a1004-mac-os-x-serve-rackmount-server-1.39__20106.1490085730.jpg)
Thinking of the server as separate from the desktop OS isn't just a "Microsoft thing".